In Short:

A basic reality: radiofrequencies interact with the immune system, and with human health in general. Interaction with the immune system yields a modified reaction to internal or external threats (cancer, but also auto-immune reactions or pathogens).


This interaction is bidirectional. In many cases, a negative effect is compensated by a positive effect. For example a cancer promotion effect is compensated by a protective effect with respect to auto-immune diseases, and vice versa.

The impact of one exposure can be offset by another: for example the impact of  GSM  exposure (2G) on Creutzfeldt-Jakob’s disease was offset by UMTS (3G).

This interaction is often transient. For example a cancer promotion effect following onset of an emitter disappears after some delay.

This interaction is part of a historical context more than 120 years old. It modified the immune system of our parents and grandparents (for example it affected their reaction to Poliomyelitis). Brutal suppression of all emissions, were it doable, would not have a solely positive effect on human health.

This interaction is not always in line with preconceptions: for example, on average on the long term the GSM (2G) technology yielded a strong anti-cancer effect.

This interaction is not always proportional to exposure power:  The health effects of TV emitters or telephony base stations (at low power) differ from those of using a mobile phone (at high power) but are just as real. Effects on Poliomyelitis often took place hundreds of kilometers from the emitter, at very low exposure power.

The existence of very low exposure effects also opens the way for the study of similar effects of natural origin, which may be physically “carried” by electromagnetic fields of the “thermal background”, which are very low power fields which are present everywhere.

Theme: Overlay by Kaira
Vincent Lauer EIRL